Webinars Required Articles  Required Partners Easy Of Doing Business E-Visiting Card Vinay Mittal
logo
VINAY NAVEEN & CO.
 Chartered Accountants
 
     
   
 

LANDMARK CASE LAWS INCOME TAX

Blogs under category: LANDMARK CASE LAWS INCOME TAX
 idSubjectBodyDateAuthorNameBlogImageSEOImageBodyTextKeywordsDescriptioncntcatVisitorCountPagename
Page 1 of 5
 Item 1 to 10 of 41

Landmark Judgements of Supreme Court on Section Section 245N to 245W [Advance Rulings]

CA. VINAY MITTAL

Landmark Judgements of Supreme Court on Section Section 245N to 245W [Advance Rulings] [1] Section 245N : Definitions Appeal against ruling - Supreme Court should not generally entertain SLP direc ........ View More

  • 29/12/2021
  • |
  • 0 comments
  • |
  • Visitor's Count: 683

Landmark Judgements of Supreme Court on Section Section 246 [Appealable order]

CA. VINAY MITTAL

Landmark Judgements of Supreme Court on Section Section 246 [Appealable order] SLP dismissed against impugned order of High Court holding that where assessee-group engaged in sale and purchase of la ........ View More

  • 29/12/2021
  • |
  • 0 comments
  • |
  • Visitor's Count: 842

Landmark Judgements of Supreme Court on Section 245 [Set off of refunds against tax remaining payabl ........

CA. VINAY MITTAL

Landmark Judgements of Supreme Court on Section 245 [Set off of refunds against tax remaining payable] SLP dismissed against High Court ruling that where demand was raised against assessee and intim ........ View More

  • 26/12/2021
  • |
  • 0 comments
  • |
  • Visitor's Count: 1240

Landmark Judgements of Supreme Court on Section 241A [Withholding of refund in certain cases]

CA. VINAY MITTAL

Landmark Judgements of Supreme Court on Section 241A [Withholding of refund in certain cases] Assessing Officer cannot withhold refund merely because assessee declared huge income in immediately pre ........ View More

  • 24/12/2021
  • |
  • 0 comments
  • |
  • Visitor's Count: 752

Landmark Judgements of Supreme Court on Section 241A [Withholding of refund in certain cases]

CA. VINAY MITTAL

Landmark Judgements of Supreme Court on Section 241A [Withholding of refund in certain cases] Assessing Officer cannot withhold refund merely because assessee declared huge income in immediately pre ........ View More

  • 22/12/2021
  • |
  • 0 comments
  • |
  • Visitor's Count: 970

Landmark Judgements of Supreme Court on Section 234B [Interest for defaults in payment of advance ta ........

CA. VINAY MITTAL

Landmark Judgements of Supreme Court on Section 234B [Interest for defaults in payment of advance tax] No Section 234B interest on advance tax deficit if tax deductible but not deducted from income ........ View More

  • 20/12/2021
  • |
  • 0 comments
  • |
  • Visitor's Count: 1165

SLP dismissed against High Court’s ruling that where co-operative bank made deposits in government s ........

CA. VINAY MITTAL

SLP dismissed against High Court’s ruling that where co-operative bank made deposits in government securities and earned interest, on basis of principle of presumption that government departments had ........ View More

  • 20/12/2021
  • |
  • 0 comments
  • |
  • Visitor's Count: 2087

Landmark Judgements of Supreme Court on Section 234A [Interest for defaults in furnishing return of ........

CA. VINAY MITTAL

Landmark Judgements of Supreme Court on Section 234A [Interest for defaults in furnishing return of income] Settlement Commission in exercise of its power under section 245D(4) and (6) does not have ........ View More

  • 18/12/2021
  • |
  • 0 comments
  • |
  • Visitor's Count: 917

Landmark Judgements of Supreme Court on Section 226 [Other modes of recovery]

CA. VINAY MITTAL

Landmark Judgements of Supreme Court on Section 226 [Other modes of recovery] SLP dismissed against High Court ruling that section 226(3)(x) does not confer arbitrary power on Income-tax department ........ View More

  • 17/12/2021
  • |
  • 0 comments
  • |
  • Visitor's Count: 886

Landmark Judgements of Supreme Court on Section 222 [Certificate by Tax Recovery Officer]

CA. VINAY MITTAL

Landmark Judgements of Supreme Court on Section 222 [Certificate by Tax Recovery Officer] Rigours of rule 2 and rule 16 of Schedule II are not applicable where sale of attached property is pursuant ........ View More

  • 17/12/2021
  • |
  • 0 comments
  • |
  • Visitor's Count: 738

 
     
464802 Times Visited