Consultation Paper – September, 2021
on
Statutory Audit and Auditing Standards for Micro, Small and Medium Companies
(MSMCs)
Last date for receipt of comments 10 November 2021
राष्ट्रीय वित्तीय ररपोिव िंगप्राविकरण
National Financial Reporting Authority 7th – 8th Floor, Hindustan Times House 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi -110001
https://nfra.gov.in https://nfra.gov.in/sites/default/files/NFRAConsultationPaperMSMCs_0.pdf
NFRA Consultation Paper on Statutory Audit and Auditing Standards for Micro, Small and Medium Companies (MSMCs)
This document of 29 September 2021 “NFRA Consultation Paper on Statutory Audit and Auditing Standards for Micro, Small and Medium Companies (MSMCs)” is issued by National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) for comments by its stakeholders. The last date for receipt of the comments is 10 November 2021. The comments should be submitted in writing either by email (comments-tac.paper@nfra.gov.in) or by post.
Disclaimer: NFRA does not accept any responsibility or liability for any loss caused to any person or any entity, howsoever arising from the use of, or refraining from the use of, the contents of this Consultation Paper.
Page #
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms…..……………………………….….
1
Executive Summary and List of Questions to Respondents……………..
2
Introduction: Setting the Context………………………………………….
4
3
NFRA’s research on MSMCs and preliminary findings…………………
11
Issues related to audit of MSMCs………………………………………….
17
5
Annexures
Annexure 1
Audit Exemption Thresholds in Global Jurisdictions
19
Annexure 2
Data Tables used by NFRA for Research
28
Annexure 3
Estimated Cost of Audit using Standard Cost Model Approach
37
6 Appendices Appendix I
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS and ACRONYMS
ASs Accounting Standards notified under the Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules 2021
AFS Annual Financial Statements
CARO Companies’ Auditors Report Order, 2020 issued by MCA
EU European Union
GPFR General Purpose Financial Reporting
GPFS General Purpose Financial Statements
IAASB International Auditing and Assurances Standards Board
IASB International Accounting Standards Board of IFRS Foundation
ICAI The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
ICFR Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
Ind ASs Indian Accounting Standards substantially converged with IFRS Standards
MCA Micro, Small and Medium-size Companies
MSMCs Micro, Small and Medium-size Companies
MSMEs Micro, Small and Medium-size Enterprises
NBFCs Non-Banking Finance Companies
NFRA National Financial Reporting Authority
PIE Public Interest Entity
SA Standards of Auditing
SMC Small and Medium-sized Company
UK United Kingdom
US United States of America
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND LIST OF QUESTIONS TO RESPONDENTS
1.1 An important function of NFRA under 132(2)(a) of the Companies Act 2013 is to make recommendation to Central Government on the formulation and laying down of accounting and auditing policies and standards for adoption by companies or class of companies or their auditors.
1.2 In view of the significant role played by companies in India in the economic growth and development of the Nation, it is essential that the regulatory environment is conducive to support, and not burden, the growth in business and economic activities of these entities. The regulations relating to financial reporting and auditing should not impose undue burdens and cost on the regulated entities, and the overall regulatory framework should be proportional to the size and type of the entities that are subject to such regulations.
1.3 In order to understand issues related to compliance with the regulatory framework specifically by smaller size companies, NFRA has done a preliminary analysis on the key financial parameters of the companies registered in India which have made MCA-21 filings. The focus of the analysis is companies with Net worth below Rs. 250 crores. These companies are referred to as Micro, Small and Medium companies (MSMCs) for the purpose of this Consultation Paper. Different regulations define Small and Medium companies differently depending upon the purpose and intention of the regulation. MSMC as a category used by NFRA in this Consultation Paper is mainly for research purposes keeping in mind that net worth threshold of Rs. 250 crores are a critical threshold differentiating AS and Ind AS companies. The data on MSMCs analysed by NFRA includes key features of their financial statements, and the primary users of the General Purpose of Financial Statements (GPFS) of such Companies. A large proportion of these MSMCs are likely to belong to the Micro, Small and Medium -size Enterprises (MSME) sector, which sector plays a significant role in the economic growth and development of the Nation. NFRA now seeks stakeholder responses to issues thrown up by the data on MSMCs obtained by NFRA. These responses will be useful in evaluating the requirement of audit and minimum thresholds for MSMCs.
1.4 Questions related to Issues about the Auditing Areas of MSMCs
1.4.1 Question No. 1 - Do you think that Micro, Small and Medium Companies (MSMCs) depending upon some criteria and threshold should be exempted from the mandatory statutory audit under Companies Act, 2013? If not, why not and if yes, what would be the criteria and thresholds for exemption?
Question No. 2 - Do you think there is a requirement for a separate set of auditing standards for MSMCs as it exists for accounting standards? If no, why not and if yes, what should be the basis for the same?
Question No. 3 – The cost of conducting an audit as per the prescribed standards is an important input for the responses to Questions 1 and 2. Do you agree with the approach for estimating standard cost of audit computed by NFRA? If not, which areas/ assumptions need changes?
Question No. 4- Do you think the current exemption thresholds for CARO, ICFR and statutory audit applicability need to be standardised and made uniform? If no, why not and if yes, what would be the criteria and thresholds?
1.5 Invitation to Comment
1.5.1 NFRA invites comments on 4 specific questions listed in Section 4 of the Consultation Paper.
In particular, the comments and responses would be useful if:
a) those specifically and precisely answer the questions listed;
b) the comments/suggestions are supported by a clear rationale; and
c) the comments/suggestions contain alternative options that can be evaluated by NFRA.
Last date for receiving the comments is 10 November 2021.
The comments can be provided as per the following contact details, and not later than 10
November 2021.
Mode
Details
Email
comments-tac.paper@nfra.gov.in
Postal
The Secretary,
National Financial Reporting Authority
7th-8th Floor, Hindustan Times House, 18-20,
Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi 110001.
1.6 Structure of the Consultation Paper
1.6.1 The Consultation Paper is organised as follows:
Section 1: Executive Summary and List of Questions to Respondents
Section 2: Introduction – Setting the Context
Section 3: NFRA’s research on MSMCs and preliminary findings
Section 4: Issues related to audit of MSMCs
Annexures and Appendices
2 INTRODUCTION – SETTING THE CONTEXT
2.1About NFRA
2.1.1 National Financial Reporting Authority (“NFRA” or “Authority”), was constituted as an independent regulator for accounting and auditing in India in October 2018. NFRA’s Charter positions it as an organisation that should be known for Objectivity, Integrity, Impartiality, Independence, Fairness, and Transparency. In making any recommendations, NFRA attempts to keep in mind the implications of such recommendations on the Ease of Doing Business. Section 132(2)(a) of Companies Act, 2013 requires NFRA to make recommendations to the Central Government on the formulation and laying down of accounting and auditing policies and standards for adoption by companies or class of companies or their auditors, as the case may be.
2.2 History of Company Law in India
2.2.1 India has, since long, embraced the Corporate (Company) Structure for the organisations engaged in trade and commerce. The Company Structure came into existence with the enactment of Joint Stock Companies Act, 1857. Thereafter, the Companies Act was passed in the year 1866 which later got replaced by the Indian Companies Act, 1913. It underwent some major changes in 1930s and also in subsequent years, separate laws for Insurance, Banking and Electricity Companies were enacted. After independence, the Government appointed a Committee under the chairmanship of Shri H.C. Bhabha in the year 1950 to revise the Indian Companies Act of 1913. Based on the recommendations of the committee, the Companies Act, 1956 came into force on 1st April, 1956. The Indian Companies Act, 2013 replaced the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and is currently in force. It is pertinent to note that from the year 1857 till date, all these Companies Act enactments have recognised the mandatory requirement relating to Accounts and Audit of accounts of the companies in India. Further, all the Companies Act enactments from 1913 onwards have recognised the need for segregation of Companies into Private and Public for various regulatory purposes and mandated filing of annual financial statements (AFSs) of the Companies and Audit of such AFSs.
2.3 Audit Requirement in Present Indian Company Law
2.3.1 Chapter X Audit and Auditors (Section 139 to Section 148) of Companies Act, 2013 contains provisions related to audit of financial statements of companies. This chapter includes provisions, inter alia, regarding appointment, resignation, removal, rights and duties of the
statutory auditors. The requirement of statutory audit is mandatory for all companies, without any exception. Section 139(1) prescribes that every Company shall appoint an individual or a firm as an auditor who shall hold office from the conclusion of that meeting till the conclusion of its sixth annual general meeting and thereafter till the conclusion of every sixth meeting. The manner and procedure for selection of auditors by the members shall be as prescribed and the matter relating to such appointment for ratification by members at every annual general meeting.
2.3.2 Section 143(2) casts a duty on the auditor to make a report to the members of the company on the accounts examined by him and on every financial statements which are required by or under the Act to be laid before the company in general meeting and requires that the report shall after taking into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act or any rules made thereunder or under any order made under sub-section (11)1 and to the best of his information and knowledge, state that the said accounts and, financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of the company’s affairs as at the end of its financial year and profit or loss and cash flow for the year and such other matters as may be prescribed.
2.3.3 Section 143(3) casts some additional reporting requirements on the auditor. One such requirement is that the auditor report shall state as to whether the company has adequate internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) with reference to financial statements in place and the operating effectiveness of such controls.
2.3.4 Section 143(11) empowers the Central Government in consultation with NFRA, to specify vide an order, certain matters to be included in the Auditor’s Report. Accordingly, the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order (CARO) has been issued. The CARO reporting origin dates back to 1975 and its scope was expanded in 1988 when the Central Government introduced Manufacturing and Other Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 1988 (‘MAOCARO 1988’) which was superseded by CARO 2003, CARO 2015, CARO 2016 and the current Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2020 (‘CARO 2020’ or ‘the Order’).
1 The Central Government may, in consultation with the National Financial Reporting Authority, by general or special order, direct, in respect of such class or description of companies, as may be specified in the order, that the auditor’s report shall also include a statement on such matters as may be specified therein.
2.3.5 Auditing Standards applicable in India2
Section 143(9) of Companies Act, 2013, requires that every auditor shall comply with auditing standards. Section 143(10) of Companies Act, 2013, states that the Central Government may prescribe the standards of auditing or any addendum thereto, as recommended by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, constituted under section 3 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, in consultation with and after examination of the recommendations made by the National Financial Reporting Authority, provided that until any auditing standards are notified, any standard or standards of auditing specified by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) shall be deemed to be the auditing standards.
As of date, there is a single set of auditing standards issued by ICAI which is applicable for all type of companies viz. private, or public or large, medium or small.
2.4 Accounting Requirement in Present Indian Company Law
2.4.1 Chapter IX Account of Companies (Section 128 to Section 138) of Companies Act, 2013, contains provisions related to accounts of companies. Amongst other provisions, this Chapter includes requirements for maintenance of books of account; preparation of financial statement and adoption of the same by Board of Directors of the Companies. Section 129 of the Companies Act, 2013 lays down certain important requirements which are summarised below:
a) Section 129(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, requires that the financial statements shall give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company or companies, comply with the accounting standards notified under section 133 and shall be in the form or forms as may be provided for different class or classes of companies in Schedule III.
b) Section 129(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, requires the Board of Directors of every company to lay at every annual general meeting of a company, such financial statements for the financial year.
c) Section 129(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, requires a Company which has one or more subsidiaries, to prepare a consolidated financial statement of the Company and of all the subsidiaries in the same form and manner as that of its own which shall also be laid before the annual general meeting of the Company in addition to financial statements provided under sub-section (2).
2 In June 2021, the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) has issued an EXPOSURE DRAFT, PROPOSED INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON AUDITING OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LESS COMPLEX ENTITIES and the comment period ends on 31 Jan, 2022. India’s position on this reform project is not yet clear.
As per Section 2(40) of Companies Act, 2013, the financial statement in relation to a company, includes-
(i) a balance sheet as at the end of the financial year;
(ii) a profit and loss account, or in the case of a company carrying on any activity not for profit, an income and expenditure account for the financial year;
(iii) cash flow statement for the financial year;
(iv) a statement of changes in equity, if applicable; and
(v) any explanatory note annexed to, or forming part of, any document referred to in sub-clause
(i) to sub-clause (iv)3
2.4.2 Accounting Standards applicable in India
2.4.2.1 Section 133 of Companies Act, 2013, states that the Central Government may prescribe the standards of accounting or any addendum thereto, as recommended by the ICAI, constituted under Section 3 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, in consultation with and after examination of the recommendations made by the National Financial Reporting Authority.
2.4.2.2 Currently, there are two sets of accounting standards notified in India.
Type
Particulars
Based on
MCA notification
Ind AS (Indian
IFRS based
standards with
Companies
(Indian
Accounting Standards)
carve outs
Accounting
Standards
(IND AS)) Rules 2015 and
amendments thereafter
(Ind AS Rules 2015)
AS (Accounting
Traditional
accounting
(Accounting
Standards)
standards applicable in India
Rules, 2021
before notification of Ind AS
(AS Rules 2021)4
Every company, other than a company to which Indian Accounting Standards as notified under Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015 are applicable, shall comply with the Accounting Standards notified under Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2021.
3 Provided that the financial statement, with respect to One Person Company, small company and dormant company, may not include the cash flow statement
4 These Accounting Standards were originally notified in 2006 under Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006.
The Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2021 define “Small and Medium Sized Company” (SMC) as a company:-
(i) whose equity or debt securities are not listed or are not in the process of listing on any stock exchange, whether in India or outside India; (ii) which is not a bank, financial institution or an insurance company; (iii) whose turnover (excluding other income) does not exceed two hundred and fifty crore rupees in the immediately preceding accounting year; (iv) which does not have borrowings (including public deposits) in excess of fifty crore rupees at any time during the immediately preceding accounting year; and (v) which is not a holding or subsidiary company of a company which is not a small and medium-sized company.
Such companies are eligible for some minimal exemptions from Accounting Standards.
2.5 Financial Reporting and General Purpose Financial Reporting (GPFR)
2.5.1 Financial Reporting generally means supply of financial information about an entity or reporting unit to the users or stakeholders, who could be an internal party or external party. In case of the former, it is commonly referred to as Management Reporting (or Accounting) and in case of latter it is known as External Financial Reporting. The more widely used and understood term is General Purpose Financial Reporting (GPFR) or General Purpose Financial Statements (GPFS).
2.5.2 The objective of GPFS5 is to provide financial information about the reporting entity that is useful to existing and potential investors, lenders and other creditors in making decisions relating to providing resources to the entity. Those decisions involve decisions about:
(a) buying, selling or holding equity and debt instruments;
(b) providing or settling loans and other forms of credit; or
(c) exercising rights to vote on, or otherwise influence, management’s actions that affect the use of the entity’s economic resources.
It may be noted that GPFS contain financial information that is useful and relevant to a wide set of external parties such as Regulators, Tax Authorities, Suppliers, Employees and the public at large. However, in recent times, the accounting standard-setting bodies whose standards form the primary bases for preparing GPFS, have consciously decided that the “Primary Users”6of
5 Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting under Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), 2020 -21
6 Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) in March 2018 and Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 8 issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), United States of America (US).
GPFS will be only those listed above in this para 2.5.2.What needs emphasis is that both such “Primary Users” and the information needs for the kind of decisions detailed above, are not likely to be found in a preponderant majority of MSMCs. Therefore, both Accounting and Auditing Standards, and the requirement of mandatory statutory audit, as applicable to other (i.e. non MSMCs or large) companies would be both unnecessary and unjustified on cost-benefit considerations.
2.5.3 Contents and Characteristics of GPFS
2.5.3.1 The GPFSs are intended to provide financial information about the reporting entity’s economic resources, claims against the entity and changes in resources and claims. This information is provided in the form of a set of financial reports or statements as listed below:
(a)Statement of financial position or Balance Sheet which provides information about the entity’s economic resources and the claims against the reporting entity.
(b)Statement of financial performance or Statement of Comprehensive Income which depicts the information about changes in entity’s resources and claims due to transactions or events other than those with the owners or shareholders of the entity.
(c)Statement of Cash Flows which gives the information about the changes in the entity’s cashflows during a particular period which is turn is intended to enable users to assess the entity’s ability to generate future net cash inflows and to assess management’s stewardship of the entity’s economic resources.
(d)Notes to financial statements to aid the understanding of the financial information summarised in the above financial statements and enhance the value of that financial information.
2.5.3.2 In order for the financial information supplied through GPFS to be useful and meet the needs of the primary users of GPFS, the accounting standard-setters have laid down certain underlying ground rules or concepts in the form of Conceptual Framework7 for Financial Reporting and one of the key components is about the qualitative characteristics of useful financial information. These qualitative characteristics have been broadly divided into following two groups.
7 Ibid footnote 1 & 2
Fundamental qualitative characteristics
Enhancing qualitative characteristics
Relevance* Comparability Materiality Verifiability Faithful representation* Timeliness Understandability
*These two aspects have been considered as two of the seven alignment principles to be considered in developing the IFRS for SMEs Standards.8
2.5.3.3 The providers as well as users of financial information incurs costs in generating and consuming the financial information supplied. The benefits of the financial information provided should justify the costs incurred by both the provider and users. Cost is considered to be a pervasive constraint in the financial information that can be provided through GPFS. Cost is, therefore, a critical aspect to consider for justifying the nature, complexity and extent of financial information that is required to be provided by the GPFS.
2.6 Profile at a Glance of companies registered in India
2.6.1 Based on the statistics published by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India (MCA), the total number of active companies was in the range of 11,59,945 to 12,99,710 during the period 2018-2021. The preponderant share is of private limited and one person companies; 93.85%, 94.43%,94.66% and 94.93% of the total number of active companies were private limited companies and one person companies as of 31 March 2018, 31 March 2019, 31 March 2020 and 31 March 2021, respectively.
The below table gives the broad category-wise details of the total number of companies:
Table 1: Total Population Size -Total number of Active Companies limited by Shares9
Company
31 March 2018
31 March 2019
31 March 2020
31 March 2021
Number
%
Private
10,88,657
93.85
10,85,178
94.43
11,28,300
94.66
12,33,768
94.93
Limited
Of which
10,71,944
-
10,62,418
11,00,235
11,97,244
8 Comprehensive Review of IFRS for SMEs Standards, Request for Information- January 2020 of IASB.
9 Source: Monthly Information Bulletin of Corporate Sector of MCA, GOI.
One Person
16,713
22,760
28,065
36,524
Public
71,288
6.15
63,989
5.57
63,592
5.34
65,942
5.07
Listed
7,239
6,915
6,802
6,740
Unlisted
64,049
57,074
56,790
59,202
Total
11,59,945
100
11,49,167
11,91,892
12,99,710
3 NFRA’S RESEARCH ON MSMCs AND PRELIMINARY FINDINGS
Key data parameters viz. payment to auditors, turnover, net worth, and indebtedness of companies with net worth below Rs. 250 crore were analysed by NFRA to understand the nature and size of such companies and the related public interest involved. The payment to auditors made by the Companies as reported in their filings is compared with the estimated standard cost of audit for a reasonably good quality audit, performed in compliance with the letter and spirit of the SAs. Further, the auditing requirement in India’s tax laws, and the exemptions from the statutory audit requirement as existing in developed economies is provided in this consultation paper so that respondents can consider those aspects as well while giving their responses.
3.1 NFRA’s Findings from MCA 21 Data
3.1.1 Of the total number of companies as per Table 1 in Para 2.6.1 above, only 52.48% (6,03,055 Companies) of the total number of active companies have filed their AFSs and MGT -7 for the financial year (FY) 2018-1910 as of June 2021 (Refer Table 1.1 in Annexure 2 for details). Such a low percentage of compliance with a critical statutory filing even after two years from the end of the reporting period indicates perhaps a lack of adequate accounting professionals with many of these companies. It may also be relevant to note that there are only 4,349 Listed Companies that have filed their AFSs & MGT-7 so far.
Of the total number of companies that have filed AFSs for the FY 2018-19, 97.09% (5,85,535
Companies) have submitted their financial statements prepared under Companies (Accounting
Standards) Rules 2006 (AS Framework) and 2.91% (17,520 Companies) have submitted
10 In view of the on-set of global pandemic COVID-19 in March 2020, there are likely to be delays in filings by the companies during FY 2019-20. Hence, the FY 2018-19 has been considered for analysis.
financial statements prepared under Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules 2015 (Ind AS Framework) (Refer Table 1.2 in Annexure 2).
Out of the total companies which have made filings, 99.41% (5,99,487 Companies)11 have reported Net Worth below ₹ 250 Crores (MSMCs for the purpose of this consultation paper).
3.1.2 The above data indicates the following key features of MSMCs:
(i) Payments to Auditors12 ((Refer Table 1.6 in Annexure 2 and Annexure 3)
(ii) Turnover (Refer Table 1.4 in Annexure 2):
i.e., nearly 61.22% have very low turnover i.e., below ₹ 50 Crores.
(iii) Indebtedness (Refer Table 1.5 in Annexure 2)
11 A small percentage of these companies (14,581 out of 5,99,487 companies) have made Ind AS filings perhaps due to voluntary adoption of Ind AS or for the reason of these companies being holding, subsidiary, associates or JVs of Ind AS companies.
12 This includes fees to auditors for other services also as separate data for statutory audit fee is not available.
companies (3,15,803 Companies, nearly 52.68%) that have low Indebtedness i.e., below
₹ 25 Crores.
(iv) Net Worth Size (Refer Table 1.3 in Annexure 2):
Worth of ₹ 9,50,457 Crores.
Crores.
Needless to say, the above analysis clearly brings out that a preponderant majority of these companies is very small in size in terms of key financial parameters. Payment to auditors by such companies is miniscule and far below the minimum standard audit fees cost estimates.
3.2 Limited Users of GPFSs of MSMCs
As depicted in Table 1.2 in Annexure 2, 94.57% of MSMCs which have made filings for FY 2018-19 are Private Limited Companies or One Person Companies. A large majority of Companies has very low or NIL Indebtedness, which indicates low risk to the larger public interest. There is likely to be a very limited number of users of GPFSs of these Companies. The Primary Users of GPFSs of these companies would be Owners or Shareholders of these Private Limited Companies, who are unlikely to depend upon GPFSs for much of the financial information they need. Lenders, if any, such as banks have special requirements that are not within the purview of GPFSs.
3.3 Auditing thresholds already available in
3.3.1 Indian Tax Laws
The Indian Tax Authorities have substantially done away with the requirement of audit by Chartered Accountants up to certain threshold amounts. By the Finance Act, 2021, Income Tax audit has been dispensed with for businesses with turnover of up to Rs 10 crores, provided not more than 5 % of the total transactions are in cash. GST Audit has also been completely done away with.
In view of the above, the extent of public interest involved in the financial reporting of these Companies is most likely to be minimal.
3.3.2 Reporting on CARO and ICFR
Nature of Company
CARO13
ICFR
One Person Company
Exempt – No reporting required
Exempt
–
No
reporting
as
per
section 2(63)
required
of
the
Act, 2013
Small
per section
2(85) of
Companies Act,
2013
not being a subsidiary or holding
which has a turnover of less
company of a public company,
than 50 Crore as per the
section
2(68) of
having a paid up capital and
latest
Audited
Financial
Companies Act, 2013
reserves and surplus not more
Statements or which has an
than ₹ 1 crores as on the balance
aggregate
borrowing from
sheet date and which does not
Banks or FIs or any Body
have total borrowings exceeding
Corporate at any point of
₹ 1 crores from any bank or
time
during
financial
financial institution at any point
year less than Rs.
25 Crore
of time during the financial year
and which does not have a total
revenue as disclosed in Scheduled
III to the Companies Act
(including
revenue
from
discontinuing
operations)
exceeding ₹ 10 crores during the
financial year as per the financial
statements.
13 CARO is not applicable to a banking company as defined in clause (c) of section 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949); (ii) an insurance company as defined under the Insurance Act,1938 (4 of 1938); (iii) a company licensed to operate under section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013
3.3.3 Global jurisdictions
The auditing ecosystem of developed economies such as EU, UK, Singapore, Australia, USA and Japan allows for exemptions to certain classes of companies depending upon thresholds based on various parameters. The following is the country/ region wise summary. Full details of country-wise exemptions are given in Annexure 1.
(i) European Union (EU)
(ii) United Kingdom
Criteria
Amount (in Pound)
Turnover
Not more than £ 10.2 million
Balance Sheet Total
Not more than £ 5.1 million
Number of employees
Not more than 50
(iii) Singapore
Amount (in Singapore Dollar)
Revenue
Not more than $ 10 million
Total Assets
(iv) Australia
Amount (in Australian Dollar)
Not more than $ 25 million
Not more than $ 12.5 million
(v) United States of America (USA)
(vi) Japan
(i) Large companies: Capital stock of ¥500 million or more, or liabilities of ¥20 billion or more, as of the latest fiscal year-end;
(ii) companies which adopt a “Company with Committees” corporate governance system; and
(iii) other companies which appoint an accounting auditors on a voluntary basis.
4 ISSUES RELATED TO AUDIT OF MSMCs
4.1 The above analysis clearly brings out the mismatch between the current payment made to auditors as reported by the companies and the estimated cost for conducting an audit in compliance with the letter and true spirit of SAs. The inference that is inescapable is that such audit as is being carried out is perhaps only a sham. In many small companies, the same persons are both owners and managers (as also pointed out by EU Directive mentioned in Annexure 1) and, therefore, have limited third-party users of GPFSs. A majority of these MSMCs is essentially family-owned enterprises formed as companies for the sake of limited liability, or to get bank loans, bus route permits, mining licences, and the like. They are effectively glorified proprietorships or partnerships. There is no public interest in foisting external audit on them. In any event, it is clear that such audit as is being carried out cannot boast of any quality at all. Banks or external investors, if any, can direct them to have an audit as a condition for giving them loans, but that can be a private matter. In the above circumstances, questions would naturally arise whether compulsory statutory audit of GPFSs is necessary, or even desirable in the case of the vast majority of companies who do not seem to be able to afford such an audit.
4.2 Exempting small companies from mandatory audit would result in furthering ease of doing business for MSMCs and reducing the compliance burden and costs on such enterprises. The audit requirement threshold exemption in tax laws of India also clearly point out the need for doing away with audit of MSMCs depending upon certain thresholds. Exemptions are also already available in CARO and ICFR Reporting depending upon certain thresholds as mentioned in Para 3.3.2. The same thought can be leveraged for overall approach towards statutory audits. Further, the criteria and basis for threshold exemptions for statutory audit, CARO and ICFR reporting can be considered for being streamlined.
4.3 NFRA requests views/comments of stakeholders on specific questions mentioned below in relation to the key issues mentioned above.
Question
No.
Do you think that Micro, Small and Medium Companies (MSMCs)
depending upon some criteria and threshold should be exempted from the
mandatory statutory audit under Companies Act, 2013? If not, why not and
if yes, what would be the criteria and thresholds for exemption?
Do you think there is a requirement for a separate set of auditing standards
for MSMCs as it exists for accounting standards? If no, why not and if yes,
what should be the basis for the same?
The cost of conducting an audit as per the prescribed standards is an
important input for the responses to Questions 1 and 2. Do you agree
with the approach for estimating standard cost of audit computed by NFRA?
If not, which areas/ assumptions need changes?
Do you think the current exemption thresholds for CARO, ICFR and
statutory audit applicability need to be standardised and made uniform? If
no, why not and if yes, what would be the criteria and thresholds?
A. European Union (EU) - Exemptions from Audit of Financial Statements of Companies
In EU, the requirements relating to annual financial statements of Companies are prescribed in DIRECTIVE 2013/34/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 26 June 201314. Article 34 in Chapter 8 of this Directive requires its member states to ensure that annual financial statements of public interest entities, medium-sized and large undertakings are audited by one or more statutory auditors or audit firms approved by Member States to carry out statutory audits on the basis of Directive 2006/43/EC.
Further, clause 43 of introductory part of the Directive states that Annual financial statements and consolidated financial statements should be audited. However, this clause also states that the annual financial statements of small undertakings should not be covered by this audit obligation, as audit can be a significant administrative burden for that category of undertaking, while for many small undertakings the same persons are both shareholders and managers and, therefore, have limited need for third-party assurance on financial statements.
Article 3 of the EU Directive defines Micro, Small and Medium-sized Undertakings as entities that do not exceed the limits of at least two of the three following criteria.
Micro
Medium-sized
Individual
Group (Parent
Group
Co. Level)
(Parent Co.
Level)
Balance Sheet Total –
350,000
4,000,000*
20,000,000
Euro
Net Turnover- Euro
700,000
8,000,000*
40,000,000
Average number of
10
50
250
employees during the
financial year
*Member States can increase these limits to Euro 6,000,000 and 12,000,000, for Balance Sheet Total and Net Turnover, respectively.
14 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013L0034&from=EN
Table below provides an overview of the current audit exemption thresholds applicable in 27 EU Member States, Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, Turkey and United Kingdom15.
15 Source: https://www.accountancyeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/Audit-exemption-thresholds-in-Europe.pdf
B. United Kingdom (UK) - Exemptions from Audit of Financial Statements of Companies
According to Section 477 & 479 of the UK Companies Act 2006, certain category of Companies or Group of Companies are exempt from the requirements related to audit of accounts. Key prescriptions are summarized16 below.
(1) A company that qualifies as a small company in relation to a financial year is exempt from the requirements of this Act relating to the audit of accounts for that year.
16 For more details, https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
(4) For the purposes of this section—
whether a company qualifies as a small company shall be determined in accordance with section 382(1) to (6),
(1) A company qualifies as small in relation to its first financial year if the qualifying conditions are met in that year.
(3) The qualifying conditions are met by a company in a year in which it satisfies two or more of the following requirements—
1.
Not more than £10.2 million
2.
Balance sheet total
Not more than 5.1 million
3.
(1) A parent company qualifies as a small company in relation to a financial year only if the group headed by it qualifies as a small group.
(2) A group qualifies as small in relation to the parent company's first financial year if the qualifying conditions are met in that year.
(4) The qualifying conditions are met by a group in a year in which it satisfies two or more of the following requirements—
1. Aggregate turnover
2. Aggregate balance sheet total
3. Aggregate number of employees
Not more than £10.2 million net (or £12.2 million gross)
Not more than £5.1 million net (or £6.1
million gross)
A company is not entitled to the exemption conferred by section 477 (small companies) if it was at any time within the financial year in question—
(a) a public company,
(b) a company that—
(i) is an authorised insurance company, a banking company, an e-money issuer, MiFID investment firm or a UCITS management company,
(ii) carries on insurance market activity, or
(iii) is a scheme funder of a Master Trust scheme within the meanings given by section 39(1) of the Pension Schemes Act 2017(interpretation of Part 1), or
(iv)a special register body as defined in section 117(1) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (c. 52) or an employers' association as defined in section 122 of that Act or Article 4 of the Industrial Relations (Northern Ireland) Order 1992 (S.I. 1992/807 (N.I. 5)).
(1) A company is not entitled to the exemption conferred by section 477 (small companies) in respect of a financial year during any part of which it was a group company unless—
(a) the group—
(i) qualifies as a small group in relation to that financial year, and
(ii) was not at any time in that year an ineligible group, or
(b) subsection (3) applies.
(3) A company is not excluded by subsection (1) if, throughout the whole of the period or periods during the financial year when it was a group company, it was both a subsidiary undertaking and dormant.
According to Section 205C of the Singapore Companies Act, certain category of Companies or Group of Companies are exempt from the requirements related to audit of accounts. Key prescriptions are summarized17 below.
Section 205C.—(1) Subject to subsections (3), (4) and (6), a company that is a small company in respect of a financial year shall be exempt from audit requirements for that financial year.
(2) Section 205B(4), (6) and (7) shall apply, with the necessary modifications, to a small company so exempt.
(3) Subsection (1) does not apply to a parent company unless the parent company —
(a) is a small company; and
(b) is part of a small group.
(4) Subsection (1) does not apply to a subsidiary company unless the subsidiary company — (a) is a small company; and (b) is part of a small group.
(5) In this section, “small company” and “small group” have the same meanings as in the Thirteenth Schedule.
17 For more details, https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/CoA1967
(a) it is a private company throughout the financial year; and
(b) it satisfies any 2 of the following criteria for each of the 2 financial years immediately preceding the financial year:
(i) the revenue of the company for each financial year does not exceed $10 million;
(ii) the value of the company’s total assets at the end of each financial year does not exceed $10 million;
(iii) it has at the end of each financial year not more than 50 employees.
7. A group is a small group from a financial year if the group satisfies any 2 of the following criteria for each of the 2 consecutive financial years immediately preceding the financial year:
(a) the consolidated revenue of the group for each financial year does not exceed $10 million;
(b) the value of the consolidated total assets of the group at the end of each financial year does not exceed $10 million;
(c) the group has at the end of each financial year an aggregate number of employees of not more than
According to Section 301 Corporation Act 2001, certain category of Companies are exempt from the requirements related to audit of accounts. Key prescriptions are summarized18 below.
(2) A small proprietary company’s financial report for a financial year does not have to be audited if:
(a) the report is prepared in response to a direction under section 293; and
(b) the direction did not ask for the financial report to be audited.
(1) Shareholders with at least 5% of the votes in a small proprietary company may give the company a direction to:
(a) prepare a financial report and directors’ report for a financial year; and
(b) send them to all shareholders.
18 For more details, https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
(2) A proprietary company is a small proprietary company for a financial year if it satisfies at least 2 of the following paragraphs:
(a) the consolidated revenue for the financial year of the company and the entities it controls (if any) is less than $25 million, or any other amount prescribed by the regulations for the purposes of this paragraph;
(b) the value of the consolidated gross assets at the end of the financial year of the company and the entities it controls (if any) is less than $12.5 million, or any other amount prescribed by the regulations for the purposes of this paragraph;
(c) the company and the entities it controls (if any) have fewer than 50, or any other number prescribed by the regulations for the purposes of this paragraph, employees at the end of the financial year.
(4) A small company limited by guarantee’s financial report for a financial year does not have to be
audited or reviewed if:
(a) the report is prepared in response to a member direction under section 294A; and
(b) the direction does not ask for the audit or review.
(1) Members with at least 5% of the votes in a small company limited by guarantee may give the
company a direction to:
(b) send them to members who have elected to receive them under section 316A.
Section 45B defines Small company limited by guarantee and quantitative threshold is revenue of less than $250,000.
E. United States of America (US)- Exemptions from Audit of Financial Statements of Companies
In US, the governing law and regulations depend upon whether the Company is an issuer of securities on US Stock Exchanges and therefore governed by SEC, US. If not, the Company will be primarily governed by the Corporate Law of the State where it is incorporated. Majority of the States in US have adopted a model law called ‘Model Business Corporation Act’ prepared/recommended by The American Bar Association19, which was reportedly revised recently in 2017. This model law does not prescribe any mandatory requirements for audit of financial statements of corporates. Following are the specimen texts of clauses relating to audit of financial statements.
19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_Business_Corporation_Act
(a) A corporation shall furnish its shareholders annual financial statements, which may be consolidated or combined statements of the corporation and one or more of its subsidiaries, as appropriate, that include a balance sheet as of the end of the fiscal year, an income statement for that
year, and a statement of changes in shareholders’ equity for the year unless that information appears elsewhere in the financial statements. If financial statements are prepared for the corporation on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles, the annual financial statements must also be prepared on that basis.
(b) If the annual financial statements are reported upon by a public accountant, his report must accompany them. If not, the statements must be accompanied by a statement of the president or the
person responsible for the corporation’s accounting records:
(1) stating his reasonable belief whether the statements were prepared on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles and, if not, describing the basis of preparation; and
(2) describing any respects in which the statements were not prepared on a basis of accounting consistent with the statements prepared for the preceding year.
(3) If the annual financial statements are reported upon by a public accountant, the accountant's report must accompany them. If not, the statements must be accompanied by accountant's a statement of the president or the person responsible for the corporation's accounting records:
(a) Stating the person's reasonable belief whether the statements were prepared on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles and, if not, describing the basis of preparation; and of and
(b) Describing any respects in which the statements were not prepared on a basis of accounting consistent with the basis used for statements prepared for the preceding year.
607.1620 Financial statements for shareholders.--
(1) Unless modified by resolution of the shareholders within 120 days of the close of each fiscal year, a corporation shall furnish its shareholders annual financial statements which may be consolidated or combined statements of the corporation and one or more of its subsidiaries, as appropriate, that include a balance sheet as of the end of the fiscal year, an income statement for that year, and a statement of cash flows for that year. If financial statements are prepared for the corporation on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles, the annual financial statements must also be prepared on that basis.
(2) If the annual financial statements are reported upon by a public accountant, his or her report must accompany them. If not, the statements must be accompanied by a statement of the president or the person responsible for the corporation's accounting records:
(a) Stating his or her reasonable belief whether the statements were prepared on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles and, if not, describing the basis of preparation; and
(b) Describing any respects in which the statements were not prepared on a basis of accounting consistent with the statements prepared for the preceding year.
The exemptions available in Japan Companies Act can be accessed at below link:-http://www.hp.jicpa.or.jp/english/accounting/system/archive01.html
Data Tables used by NFRA for its Research
1 Population size of Companies & Status of Filing of AFSs/MGT 7
Before identifying and analysing the certain key features of MSMCs, it is considered appropriate to identify the population size of the companies with net worth below ₹ 250 crores and the status of filing of Annual Financial Statements by these Companies. The data sources used for this purpose are as follows.
a) Population Size: This data is obtained from Monthly Information Bulletins published by Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India (MCA).
b) Status of Filing of AFSs/MGT 7: This data is obtained from annual returns (viz. MGT 9) and AOC-4 filed with MCA and stored I the MCA’s Corporate Data Management (CDM). Filings are for the financial year 2018-1920 and cut-off date for filings is June 2021.
Table 1.1. Summary Status of Filing of Annual Financial Statements/MGT-7 for FY 2018-19
Total Active Companies
AFS/MGT-7 Filing Data
Total number of filings
Companies with Net Worth
Company Type
below ₹ 250 crores
above ₹ 250 crores
Number of
Private Limited
94.43%
5,68,556
52.39%
5,66,935
94.57%
1,621
45.43%
of which
5,60,405
5,58,784
8,151
20 In view of the on-set of global pandemic COVID-19 in March 2020, there are likely to be delays in filings by the companies during 2019-20. Hence, the previous filing year has been considered.
Companies with Net
Worth
Public Limited
5.57%
34,499
53.91%
32,552
5.43%
1,947
54.57%
4,349
3478
871
30,150
29,074
1,076
100%
6,03,055
52.48%
5,99,487
3,568
Table 1.2 AFS/MGT 7 Filings by Type of Filings for 2018-19- Companies with
A) Net Worth below ₹ 250 crores
Type of Filings
AOC 4 XBRL -Ind AS
AOC 4 XBRL -AS
AOC 4 -AS
8,517
58.41%
23,404
78.58%
5,35,014
96.38%
558784
23,401
5,26,866
8151
0
8,148
6,064
41.59%
6,379
21.42%
20,109
3.62%
2,491
655
332
29074
3,573
5724
19,777
Total (A)
14,581
29,783
5,55,123
B) Net Worth above ₹ 250 crores
1,261
42.91%
228
76.51%
132
39.88%
1,678
57.09%
70
23.49%
199
60.12%
812
54
866
65
145
Total (B)
2,939
298
331
Grand Total (A+B)
17,520
30,081
5,55,454
Net Worth Based Analysis
Table 1.3 Companies with Net Worth below ₹ 250 crores (all amount in crores except no. of companies)
No. of Companies
Turnover Analysis
Indebtedness Analysis
Net Worth Range
Total No.
Net
Turnover range
Indebtedness
(₹ Crores)
(₹
companies with
companies
(Min &Max) (₹
Range
(Min
Crores)
+ve Turnover
with
zero
Zero
&Max)
Positive
>=200-<250
497
246
743
1,65,888
678
0 & 5,960
496
247
0 & 2,771
>=100-<200
2,192
1086
3,278
4,58,021
2,928
350
& 16,780
2,272
1,006
0 & 18,413
>=50-<100
4,383
1,514
5,897
4,12,461
5,031
& 19,538
3,801
2,096
0 & 8,525
>=25-<50
7,501
9,448
3,32,026
7,878
1,570
& 14,081
6,208
3,240
0 & 8,236
>=10-<25
18,032
3,233
21,265
3,31,823
17,193
4,072
& 21,260
13,743
7,522
0 & 9,959
>=5-<10
22,274
2,675
24,949
1,76,764
19,893
5,056
& 10,468
16,158
8,791
0 & 1,779
>=1-<5
79,570
5,992
85,562
2,03,538
66,039
19,523
-0.03 & 64,265
54,987
30,575
0 & 6,540
>=0.5-<1
39,584
1,868
41,452
29,880
31,016
10,436
0 & 5,145
25,571
15,881
0 & 1,507
>=0.2-<0.5
49,762
1,997
51,759
17,132
37,977
13,782
-0.47 & 4,242
30,165
21,594
0 & 1,600
>=0-<0.2
2,25,471
6,712
2,32,183
9,770
1,32,787
99,396
0 & 5,223
91,043
1,41,140
0 & 4,833
Subtotal (A)
4,49,266
27,270
4,76,536
21,37,302
3,21,420
1,55,116
2,44,444
2,32,092
Negative Net
>=50000 & above
>=25000-<50000
-1,41,290
2,720
& 54,900
113 & 72,700
>=10000-<25000
-1,53,176
11.8
& 17,300
55.2 &
29,600
>=5000-<10000
14
-1,02,959
9
& 23,900
12
0 &19,800
Total Net
No. of
Worth (₹
Range (Min
with +ve
with zero
with Zero
&Max) (₹
>=1000-<5000
25
72
97
-2,05,983
80
0 & 21,500
94
0 & 28, 600
>=250-<1000
112
154
266
-1,25,867
193
73
0 & 9,110
251
15
0 & 9,330
41
26
67
-14,916
42
0 & 2,240
0 & 5,590
186
137
323
-45,557
232
91
0 & 1,770
299
24
0 & 3,750
340
533
-37,743
358
175
0 & 12, 900
479
0 & 5,620
622
265
887
-30,712
562
325
0 & 36,800
789
98
0 & 3,820
1,588
456
2,044
-31,779
1,328
716
0 & 2,400
1,787
257
0 & 2,840
2,205
419
2,624
-18,602
1,731
893
0 & 3,150
2,237
387
0 & 1,750
11,004
1,056
12,060
-26,908
7,857
4,203
0&7,960
10,228
1,832
0 & 2,230
8,340
464
8,804
-6,280
5,826
2,978
0&287
7,308
1,496
0&567
14,881
582
15,463
-4,983
10,050
5,413
0&540
12,366
3,097
0&678
78,321
1,433
79,754
-3,702
40,665
39,089
0&249
52,282
27,472
0 & 1,610
Subtotal (B)
1,17,669
5,282
1,22,951
-9,50,457
68,948
54,003
88,212
34,739
11,86,845
3,90,368
2,09,119
3,32,656
2,66,831
Table 1.4 Turnover Analysis of Companies with Net Worth below ₹ 250 crores (all amount in crores except no. of companies)
Net Worth Analysis
Turnover Range
Total No. of
range
+ve Net
negative
Net Worth
>=25,000 &
2,13,295
-48,720 & 3.83
8.97
& 72,709
above
>=10,000-<25,000
27
4,12,707
13
-19,831 & 191
& 20,494
>=5,000-<10,000
2,01,554
-11,476 & 211
& 16,131
>=1,000-<5,000
254
159
413
7,23,512
-35,300 &249
55
& 29,569
>=800-<1,000
165
78
243
2,14,200
220
23
-3,468 & 243
219
& 28,598
>=500-<800
640
891
5,47,526
831
60
-3,337 & 249
775
116
& 13,452
>=200 - <500
3,321
1,083
4,404
13,29,059
4,170
234
-6,556& 249
3782
>=100 - <200
5,760
1,288
7,048
9,82,077
6,653
395
-14,375 &249
6045
1,003
& 20,445
>=50 - <100
8,790
1,497
10,287
7,22,440
9,663
624
-9,716 & 249
8706
1,581
0 & 6,224
>=25 - <50
14,212
1,615
15,827
5,59,003
14,864
963
-1,053 & 247
13,354
2,473
>=10 - <25
26,509
2,011
28,520
4,54,875
26,267
2,253
-15,108 & 248
23,459
5,061
& 15,313
>=5 - <10
25,756
1,529
27,285
1,95,221
24,678
2,607
-3,050 & 248
21,350
5,935
0 & 6,833
>=1 - <5
73,648
3,197
76,845
1,86,180
65,893
10,952
-2,314 & 248
54,171
22,674
& 14,000
>=0.5 - <1
34,359
1,339
35,698
26,072
28,613
7,085
-942 & 242
21,842
13,856
0 & 3,357
>=0.2 - <0.5
38,900
1,593
40,493
13,420
31,048
9,445
-2,406 & 248
22,214
18,279
0 & 1,577
>0 - <0.2
1,36,914
5,437
1,42,351
8,064
1,08,143
34,208
-950 & 241
59,247
83,104
<=0
1,97,685
11,437
2,09,122
-1
1,55,119
-9,369 & 249
97,080
1,12,042
-0.72& 9,332
67,89,203
Table 1.5 Indebtedness Analysis of Companies with Net Worth below ₹ 250 crores (all amount in crores except no. of companies)
Indebtedness Range
Worth range
+ve
zero &
negative Net
turnover
>=25,000 & above
64082
-35,300 & -2,640
907
& 31,800
16
1,14,005
-19,800 & 154
1.1
& 21,500
1,27,628
8
29
-9,940 & 195
33
173
185
2,81,595
139
-6,120 & 249
302
56
& 36,800
74
129
37,066
-3,810 & 249
103
& 15,179
273
146
98,914
256
163
-6,790 & 247
87
1,060
502
1,562
3,43,633
1037
525
-4,770 & 249
1,243
319
& 13,124
1,695
676
2,371
5,39,871
1744
627
-48,700 & 249
1,949
422
& 54,945
3,300
4,303
6,86,302
3330
973
-10,649 & 247
3,534
769
& 14,683
6,251
1,401
7,652
7,38,248
6066
1586
-1,850 & 249
6,307
1,345
0 & 9,466
16,081
2,354
18,435
9,13,833
14514
3921
-614 & 248
15,137
3,298
0 & 7,960
20,165
1,950
22,115
5,99,014
17404
4711
-424 & 246
18,004
4,111
& 64,265
69,559
4,026
73,585
7,73,869
55671
17914
-304 & 249
56,366
17,219
& 19,384
35,007
1,554
36,561
1,61,512
26408
10153
-544 & 245
26,671
9,890
-0.956 & 3,614
45,284
1,775
47,059
1,63,897
33440
13,619
-121 & 239
33,294
13,765
-0.476 & 10,468
1,14,310
3,738
1,18,048
1,79,524
84351
33,697
-2,050 & 249
72,280
45,768
2,53,690
13,142
2,66,832
9,66,210
232093
-9,720 & 249
1,54,789
1,12,043
-0.032 & 14,434
3,90,365
Payments to Auditors Analysis
Table 1.6 Payments to Auditors Analysis of Companies with Net Worth
below ₹ 250 crores (all amount in actuals except no. of companies)
Auditors Payments Range
(₹ Actuals)
>=50,00,000
177
264
>=10,00,000-<50,00,000
3,818
1,004
4,822
>=5,00,000-<10,00,000
4,887
1,185
6,072
>=1,00,000-<5,00,000
33,357
4,966
38,323
>=50,000-<1,00,000
34,272
2,977
37,249
>=25,000-<50,000
78,430
4,714
83,144
1,23,390
6,336
1,29,726
74,694
3,090
77,784
38,127
1,764
39,891
>0-<1,000
754
63
817
1,75,025
6,367
1,81,392
<0
5,66,932
32,555
1) Key Assumptions for estimating the standard audit cost.
a) Audit relates to statutory audit of GPFR of an SMC.
b) Audit is performed by either a Small or Medium Practitioner, (SMP CA) located in one of three categories of cities i.e., small cities, mid-tier cities and metro cities.
c) Audit is in accordance with the existing set of Standards on Auditing (SAs)21 as required under the Companies Act, 2013.
d) GPFR are prepared in accordance with the revised set of ASs, which are largely aligned with high-quality Ind AS Framework relevant and useful for large PIEs.
2) Using the audit cost estimation approach described above, expected cost of audit across different size of MSMCs will be as follows.
21 Recently in June 2021, International Assurance and Auditing Standards Board has issued exposure draft for public consultation of a set of standards called ‘PROPOSED INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LESS COMPLEX ENTITIES’. It is expected to be issued in Dec 2022. India’s position on this reform project is not yet clear.
Table 1.7: Estimated Cost of Audit
Estimated Audit Fees
Avg PBT per
Avg.of
(in Rs. crores)
Company (in
Estimated
Small Firm -
Firm
Mid
Tier
Metro
City
Rs. Lakhs)*
Audit
City (in Rs.
(in
Rs.
Fees as %
Town
Lakhs)
to PBT#
37.09
62.43
106.19
2,144
4.95%
33.95
57.15
97.22
22,132
0.44%
22.07
37.15
63.20
10,969
0.58%
13.80
23.23
39.51
4,798
0.82%
>=800-<1000
8.11
13.65
23.21
3,535
0.66%
6.47
10.89
18.52
2,308
0.80%
4.03
6.78
11.53
1,560
0.74%
3.62
6.10
10.38
770
1.35%
3.26
5.49
9.34
398
2.34%
2.94
4.95
8.43
203
2.68%
2.64
4.44
7.56
105
4.65%
2.38
4.00
6.80
53
8.25%
2.14
3.60
6.13
15.86%
Avg. of
Small Firm
Firm -
- Mid Tier
- Metro City
(in Rs.
Town (in
1.94
3.27
5.56
31.11%
1.75
2.95
5.02
39.32%
1.50
2.68
4.57
58.53%
*For Average PBT calculation, the data is based on 2,36,983 company filings. The companies with NIL turnover has been excluded and only the Companies which have positive PBT have been considered.
# Avg. of Estimated Audit Fees as % to PBT for companies with turnover upto ₹50 crores has been calculated on basis of avg. of estimated audit fees in small town, mid- tier city and metro city. The Avg. of Estimated Audit Fees as % to PBT for companies with turnover above ₹50 crores has been calculated on basis of estimated audit fees in metro city assuming companies with turnover above ₹50 crores are more likely to exist in metro cities.
3) Supporting details for the above cost estimation. (Refer Appendix I)
Page 39 of 39
Supporting Details for Cost Estimation
Tab:- Costing Regular Audit
Reference Tab
Tab Estimated Cost
For cost per hour calculations
per hour
For estimated hours
Tab Estimated Hours
Cost per hour of
staff (Rs./hour)
partner
(Rs./hour)
Small Firm - Small Town
241
686
Small Firm - Mid Tier City
468
1,145
Small Firm - Metro City
885
1,971
Revenue (in crores)
Field Hours (Ref tab
Partner Hours @
Total Hours
Total Cost
Field
Partner
Total Cost (in
Estimated Hours)
45% over and
(in Rs.)
Hours (Ref Hours @
Hours
Rs.)
above field hours
tab
40%
35%
over and
Hours)
field
hours
>=25000 - <50000
6,743
3,034
9,777
37,08,633
2,697
9,440
62,42,573
2,360
9,103
1,06,18,800
>=10000 - <25000
6,174
2,778
8,952
33,95,485
2,469
8,643
57,15,465
2,161
8,334
97,22,173
>=5000 - <10000
4,013
1,806
5,819
22,07,153
1,605
5,618
37,15,200
1,405
5,418
63,19,665
>=1000 - <5000
2,509
1,129
3,638
13,79,952
3,513
23,22,810
878
3,387
39,51,168
>=800 - <1000
1,474
663
2,137
8,10,701
590
2,064
13,64,616
516
1,990
23,21,252
>=500 - <800
1,176
529
1,705
6,46,801
470
1,646
10,88,731
412
18,51,963
732
329
1,061
4,02,601
293
1,025
6,77,679
988
11,52,752
659
297
956
3,62,451
923
6,10,096
231
890
10,37,792
593
267
860
3,26,150
237
830
5,48,994
208
801
9,33,855
535
776
2,94,250
214
749
4,95,298
187
722
8,42,517
480
216
696
2,64,000
192
672
4,44,380
168
648
7,55,903
432
194
626
2,37,600
605
3,99,942
151
583
6,80,313
389
564
2,13,950
156
545
3,60,133
136
6,12,596
353
512
1,94,150
141
494
3,26,804
124
477
5,55,904
144
463
1,75,450
128
447
2,95,327
431
5,02,361
>=0 - <0.2
290
406
1,49,551
2,68,479
102
392
4,56,691
Tab:- Estimated Cost per hour
Assumption
9 hours per day with 22 working days in a month
Cost rate of partner has been determined on basis of his monthly salary and profit of the firm Cost rate of staff has been determined on basis of his monthly salary and overheads of the firm
No. of resources
Small Firm - Mid
Small Town/
Tier City
Metro City
6
Staff-Senior
Staff-AM
Staff-Manager
Article
20
Salary
80,000
1,20,000
1,80,000
Staff - Senior
22,000
30,000
55,000
40,000
70,000
1,00,000
Article (Avg)
1,500
2,000
2,500
Rent
Area (sq feet)
Per Partner
Per Staff
Total Area for Partner
300
600
1,000
Total Area for Staff (other than
1200
Total Area for Article
500
1500
2000
1,050
2,700
4,200
Per Square Ft Rent per month
35
315
Total Rent per month
36,750
2,70,000
13,23,000
Small Town
Mid Tier City
Salaries - Partner
2,40,000
7,20,000
18,00,000
88,000
8,80,000
2,80,000
1,40,000
4,00,000
Salaries - Article
2,00,000
Electricity@20% of rent
7,350
54,000
2,64,600
Office Expense@25% of rent
9,188
67,500
3,30,750
Depreciation @ 10% of rent
3,675
27,000
1,32,300
Printing @ 10% of rent
Internet @ 10% of rent
Mobile
3,000
8,000
Travel @ 5% of Partner Salary
12,000
36,000
90,000
Software
10,000
15,000
25,000
Subscriptions @ 30% of Softw
4,500
7,500
Total Cost per month
4,78,813
18,31,000
60,05,750
Profit @ 35%
1,67,584
6,40,850
21,02,013
6,46,397
24,71,850
81,07,763
Total partner Hours in a
594
1,188
1,980
month
Cost per hour of partner
Total Staff hours in a month
990
2,376
4,752
Cost per hour of staff
Tab:- Estimated Hours
The below sheet gives budget (in terms of hours) depending upon size of the Company for audit.
"Illustrative Audit Planning Schedule" as per "Implementation Guide to Standard on Auditing (SA) 300, Planning an Audit of Financial Statements" issued by ICAI for putting worksteps required for an audit has been used for hours estimation.
Turnover (in Rs. Crores) (Horizontal)
>=25000 -
>=10000 -
>=5000 -
>=1000 -
>=200 -
>=100 -
>=50 -
>=25 -
>=10 -
>=5 -
>=1 -
>=0.5 -
>=0.2 -
>=0 -
Work Steps (Vertical)
<50000
<25000
<10000
<5000
<500
<200
<100
<50
<25
<10
<5
<1
<0.5
<0.2
Meetings
Meetings with management to understand entity’s operations and significant developments,
83
76
69
43
7
update progress
Deployment of engagement team and team meetings
371
338
307
113
90
62
45
30
22
120
75
44
18
Meetings with Those Charged with Governance – sharing audit strategy and conclusions
Perform risk assessment
Perform preliminary analytics and other planning procedures
211
Identify and assess key risk
157
61
36
Determine audit strategy
278
253
158
99
58
46
32
21
Develop responses to risks through detailed audit plan
540
491
Perform tests of controls
Identify key controls
521
474
296
109
49
40
Review work of others (Internal audit, Type 1/2 reports)
93
Perform tests as designed
1,045
950
218
174
108
57
51
Evaluate deficiencies and impact on substantive procedures
Perform Substantive Procedures
Determine procedures responsive to key risks
Perform substantive analytical procedures or tests of details as planned and obtain sufficient
1,306
1,187
742
150
135
122
110
89
59
appropriate audit evidence
Evaluate appropriateness and sufficiency of audit evidence
437
397
248
155
Execute changes to audit strategy and plan if circumstances require
Conclusions
Perform final analytics and other closing procedures
349
317
198
Review by Engagement Partner and conclude on evidences obtained
Consultations with Quality Review Partner
Share draft results and discuss with management
240
Finalise and Issue opinion, discuss with Those Charged with Governance
6743
6174
4013
2509
1474
1176
810
The Engagement Partner hours and consultations with Quality Review Partner will depend
upon firm location. This is based on the assumption that partner of small firm in small city
will invest more time in reviews as compared to partner of small firm in metro city. For
details of these hours refer "Costing Regular Audit" tab